NL architects: a proposal to save the kleiburg in amsterdam NL architects: a proposal to save the kleiburg in amsterdam
dec 12, 2012

NL architects: a proposal to save the kleiburg in amsterdam

‘kleiburg’ proposal by NL architects, amsterdam, the netherlandsall images courtesy of NL architects

 

 

one of the biggest apartment blocks in the netherlands, the modernist ‘kleiburg’ in the bijlmermeer district of amsterdam was constructed during the 1960sby then city planner, siegfried nassuth. the bending footprint stretches 400 meters in length and spans 11 storeys in height, accommodates 500 units in this building alone. once part of a grander scheme to produce a vertical garden city, this structure remains after failed revitalization attempts during the 1990s. currently joined by the bijlmer museum and elevated subway lines, the project would require over 70 million euro to be renovated to today’s standards. leading to an inevitable demolition, a unique solution was needed to avoid this fate. the owner, housing corporation rochdale, offered an alternative for activists. in an effort to save dutch architect ottenhof’s masterpiece, it would be offered for only one euro to catalyze an economically feasible plan.

 

approximately 50 parties responded with ideas for student housing or shelters for the homeless. this proposal by local firm NL architects suggests to renovate the elevators, galleries and installations but to leave the units as bare shells without furnishings, rooms or heating and allow for retrofitting by future owners. the move reduces the cost of initial investments, introducing a new business model into the country. residents will be happily enticed by a low price and the freedom to personalize to their own desires. adjacent as well as stacked dwellings may be joined, marking opportunities to break down the repetitive elevations.opening to the outside environment, a catalogue of facade modules with sliding doors, double doors and windows are set back to create patios for plants and dining areas to activate the once uniform exterior. wood elements add a tactile touch to the original, minimal hardware.

 

 

trees define parking scheme

 

 

multi-storey parking garages have been demolished, lowering the plane of roads. taking space away from valuable green parkland, ground level parking complies with new zoning laws and budget limitations. to protect the trees, they became defining elements,forcing roadways to bend around their plots, creating gently curving lanes. 

 

 

curved parking roads

 

 

tactile timber-clad exterior

 

 

alternative outcome after residents move in

 

 

owners personalize their unit

 

 

aerial view of the building

 

 

concrete model

 

 

model detail

 

 

exterior after renovation

 

 

alternative views

 

 

parking scheme

 

 

parking plan / after – 500 spaces

 

 

parking plan / before – 422 spaces

 

 

facade options

 

 

elevation before and after

 

 

project info:

 

 

project name: kleiburg de flat – residential revamp of a modern monument, amsterdam zuidoost 2012 – 2013client: consortium de flat – kondorwessels vastgoed, hendriks cpo, vireo vastgoed, hollands licht / martijn blomarchitect: NL architects – pieter bannnenberg, walter van dijk, kamiel klaasse rappange & partners architecten bvteam: guus peters with iwan hameleers, giulia pastore and fouad addou, matthew davis, paul ducom, soo kyung chun, adrian mans, paulo dos sousa, carmen valtierra de luisstructure: van rossum raadgevende ingenieurs amsterdam bvbuilding physics: schreuder groepinstallations: homij technische installaties bv, amsterdamcontractor: kondorwessels amsterdam bvsize: gross floor area 65.600m², net floor area 59.400m²

  • Hilberseimer is dead!
    Long live him?????

    giopezzi says:
  • Déjà fait cet immeuble, allez voir : Cité du Lignon à Genève. Un petit air de ressemblance, n’est-ce pas ?

    zumthor says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.

comments policy
LOG IN
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

architecture news