laird kay's LEGO city critiques the artificial architecture of modern megacities
laird kay's LEGO city critiques the artificial architecture of modern megacities laird kay's LEGO city critiques the artificial architecture of modern megacities
feb 02, 2016
laird kay's LEGO city critiques the artificial architecture of modern megacities

laird kay’s LEGO city critiques the artificial architecture of modern megacities
all images courtesy of laird kay





is it dubai? is it hong kong? new york? singapore? toronto? vancouver? or all of the above?


photographer and art director laird kay looks at the virtually indistinguishable line between architectural artificiality and reality through the series, ‘LEGO city’. the stylized compositions — conceived and meticulously constructed by kay’s husband and collaborator raymond girard — depict colossal toy brick towers stacked to resemble the urban landscapes of some of the most densely-populated cities on earth. 


the seemingly-endless LEGO columns mimic the overwhelming concentration of buildings captured by michael wolf in hong kong last year, or the panorama of skyscrapers piercing dubai clouds, as documented by daniel cheong — illustrating an indifference to place and culture when constructing contemporary cityscapes. ‘cities used to be the result of collective will and a desire to shape – to control – our environments. they were expressions of the things that happened in them,’ kay says. ‘now they’re about branding and image. like plastic, like ‘LEGO city’, they’re no longer built to last – they can be pulled down when fashions change. ‘LEGO city’ expresses the modern absence of community in city-shaping.’

‘elevation no. 1′

‘looking north’

‘approaching from the east’

‘approaching from the west’

‘view from the helicopter’

‘polar vortex’ 

‘hotel on a the hill’


‘tram on the viaduct’

‘architectural detail’

‘power station lighting up the city’

‘streetview at night’

‘before the summer rains’

‘after the summer rains’


via [hifructose]

comments policy
login with designboom
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

LEGO (100 articles)