marc quinn sculpture controversy at the venice art biennale
original content
may 31, 2013
marc quinn sculpture controversy at the venice art biennale


marc quinn’s ‘breath’ is an 11 metre tall inflatable sculpture depicting a naked alison lapper at 8 months pregnant
image © designboom

 

 

 

marc quinn at fondazione cini

 

fondazione giorgio cini presents a solo exhibition of marc quinn on the island of san giorgio maggiore during the 2013 venice art biennale, showcasing more than 50 of his works (with the debut of at least 15 new pieces). the british artist explores issues which deal with the relation between art and science and the human body as a survival mechanism, life and its preservation, beauty and death, and his 11 metre tall sculpture ‘breath’ — depicting a naked alison lapper at 8 months pregnant, an artist born with phocolemic–is causing a bit of controversy amongst members of the catholic church for its placement in the piazza, outside the church of san giorgio maggiore. venice’s patriarchate don gianmatteo caputo is not happy about its installation.

its location separates it from the rest of quinn’s exposition which is being shown on the island, and caputo has stated that the international art exhibition seems to take advantage of its stage, selecting more provocative works to be placed within close proximity of houses of worship on the occasion of the biennale. however, quinn’s intentions for the work, which is an inflatable replica of his original 2005 carrara marble version of lapper, is meant to express alternate values of beauty and present ‘a new model of female heroism’.

 

 

 


the 11 metre tall inflatable sculpture is a replica of quinn’s 2005 cararra marble depiction of alison lapper
image © designboom

 

 


positioned outside the church of san giorgio maggiore, ‘breath’ has caused some controversy amongst the catholic church
image © designboom

 

 


image © designboom

 

 

close-up

image © designboom

 

 


view of the sculpture from the water
image © designboom

 

 

full article here

comments policy
LOG IN VIA
login with designboom
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

product library