kim albrecht's interactive graph visualizes the 'science of success' kim albrecht's interactive graph visualizes the 'science of success'
nov 12, 2016

kim albrecht's interactive graph visualizes the 'science of success'

 

kim albrecht works as an interface design researcher in a physics lab at the center for complex network research. his work asks the basic question: ‘how can design help us to understand the world surrounding us?’ for albrecht, design in this sense is not about decoration or communication, but rather acts as a tool to create insights and knowledge. his most recent project sees him visualize the scientist’s path to success using an interactive graph of data that questions the correlation between career, ability, achievements and lasting scientific impact.

career-paths-kim-albrecht-click-hires
the project visualizes the randomness of success in science

 

 

albrecht’s project — created in collaboration with roberta sinatra and laszlo barabasi — is entitled ‘the science of success’, and was featured recently in the journal ‘science’. visualizing the randomness of significant scientific achievements, the interface allows you to explore 10,000 careers spanning seven different disciplines: physics, ecology, economics, neuroscience, chemistry, biology and cognitive sciences.

 

‘over the last five years, my work has become influenced by the idea of design as ‘drawing things together’. a connection between art, science, and technology,’ explains kim albrecht. ‘before the renaissance, art and science were not seen as two separate disciplines. today they co-exist in our cultural realm but intersect only seldom. I am trying to bring these disciplines closer together through the artifacts I create. my work is done collaboratively with scientists. once created, they become boundary objects reaching various audiences.’

career-paths-kim-albrecht-filter-hires
albrecht sees design as less about decoration or communication, but rather as a tool to create insight

 

 

clicking anywhere on the histogram filters the scientists according to a number of criteria: their average citations after ten years, their ‘individual Q’ or ability to consistently produce high impact papers, the number of papers they have produced, and their ‘H-index’ — a scientist has index ‘H’ if they have ‘H’ papers with ‘H’ citations. the result? the highest-impact work has the same probability of falling anywhere in the sequence of papers published by a scientist. it could be the first publication, appear mid-career, or emerge last. this result is known as the ‘random impact’ rule, and can be observed throughout the graph’s beautifully realized data. no matter discipline, rank or prolificness: impact peaks are career-wide, occurring whenever and wherever inspiration hits.

 

 

designboom has received this project from our ‘DIY submissions‘ feature, where we welcome our readers to submit their own work for publication. see more project submissions from our readers here.

 

edited by: peter corboy | designboom

    have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.

    comments policy
    LOG IN
    designboom's comment policy guidelines
    generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
    the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

    what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
    let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

    - please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
    - please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
    - please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
    - please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
    - please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
    (there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
    in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
    the best 100-200 entries too.)

    a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

    design news