american folk art museum update  MoMA reconsiders demolition decision american folk art museum update  MoMA reconsiders demolition decision
may 10, 2013

american folk art museum update MoMA reconsiders demolition decision

characteristic bronze facade of the american folk art museumimage © masako fujinami




may 10th update: MoMA has just announced that it would  reconsider the demolition of the beloved american folk art museum in the wake of the selection of new york-based firm diller scofidio + renfro to handle the purported five-building expansion. the architects were responsible for thethe redevelopment of the lincoln center campus and have been long-time friends and colleague of the endangered american folk art museum’s architects, todd williams and billie tsien. whether the building can be spared remains an open question, albeit one that softens the definitive announcement of the building’s destruction just one month ago.





april 10th: news of the planned demolition of the 12 year-old american folk art museum expansion designed by revered tod williams billie tsien architects has spread across the nation received by a range of responses. for most, the museum is a much welcomed architectural gem with a sensible design and a mastery in material; it is studied by students, it is an archetype for what is considered to be ‘great architecture’ in the 21st century. people seem to refer to its innate spirit as a work of art, transcending the traditional trappings of what defines a ‘building’ – architecture critic herbert muschamp speaks of its‘heart’ being ‘in the right time as well as the right place’, declaring it a ‘midtown icon.’  others however, suggest the museum is unable to carry out itsfunctions effectively. critics have opined that the small architectural treasure sealed its fate when it was built in the lot adjacent to the much larger institution: the museum of modern art.


‘it’s very rare that a building that recent comes down, especially a building that was such a major design and that got so much publicity when it opened for its design — mostly very positive. the building is so solid looking on the street, and then it becomes a disposable artifact. it’s unusual and it’s tragic because it’s a notable work of 21st century architecture by noteworthy architects who haven’t done that much work in the city, and it’s a beautiful work with the look of a handcrafted facade,‘  says director of columbia university’s historic preservation program andrew s. dolkart.



museum entrance interiorimage courtesy of tod williams billie tsien architects



in order for the building to be completed in the first place back in 2001, the developers were forced to borrow 32 million USD. this was a cost which proved to be too burdensome for the modest museum, so the owners sold it to MoMa and moved to another location to help alleviate the debt. now thatthe museum is in MoMa’s hands, they are left with a structure that doesn’t necessarily fit the campus’s glass aesthetic and whose floors don’t line upwith the existing surrounding structures.


‘it’s not a comment on the quality of the building or tod and billie’s architecture,’ says MoMa’s director glenn d. lowry, who personally visited the architects’studio to communicate the museum’s decision. the lot is the perfect amount of space needed to complete MoMa’s five-building complex, and will connect to a new 82-storey tower designed by acclaimed french architect jean nouvel. the museum will eventually gain 10,000 square feet of gallery space at thefolk art’s site, and an additional 40,000 with nouvel’s tower. although the decisions all around seem to be devoid of any purposeful malice towards the architects, more based on practical economical needs, one can’t help but feel an unfortunate loss for the world of architecture.


architect billie tsien states:

‘we feel really disappointed. there are of course the personal feelings — your buildings are like your children, and this is a particular, for us, beloved small child. but there is also the feeling that it’s a kind of loss for architecture, because it’s a special building, a kind of small building that’s crafted, that’s particular and thoughtful at a time when so many buildings are about bigness.’



if you would like to take part in the petition to save the folk art museum, click here.


read more

  • what a shame – a truly beautiful building, particularly on the inside

    dbkii says:
  • It is a beautiful building, if a bit design-ostentatious and self-conscious. A failure as a museum, however. The trustees were bewitched by the location, assumed huge spillover from MoMA attendance, but that didn’t (and was unlikely to) happen.

    Would make a great corporate headquarters for, say, a technology company or ad agency or hedge fund. Too bad MoMA couldn’t build around it and lease the building for its income stream. But Jean Nouvel, the new tower’s designer, wouldn’t stand for if. Besides, he’s already suffered enough: the city and its misguided Planning Commission under Amanda Burden decapitated his Torre Verre because it ostensibly eclipsed the Chrysler Building, 15 streets and three and a half avenues away.

    Mort d'Urban says:
  • At a time when we are becoming more sensitive to WASTE, this is a shame, if not shameful. A loss in so many ways.

    Mike Jackson says:
  • Please help out with signing the PETITION to save it!

    Tell everyone you know.

    Chris says:
  • …. and we wonder why the arts and architects get so little respect.

    rich says:
  • This is really not a great building at all. I was completely disappointed when I visited. Keeping the facade would be interesting, but nothing behind it is worth anything architecturally.

    I feel is would be hard to build a less interesting building in it place.

    Peter says:
  • Petition signed! Looks like another environmental travesty awaits.

    Mr Green says:
  • It served its purpose. demolish it. There is nothing permanent in this world but change. Nostalgia is a disease that should be cured. Blast it. even though we all know the replacement building will be comparatively uglier

    Numa says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.

comments policy
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.


a diverse digital database that acts as a valuable guide in gaining insight and information about a product directly from the manufacturer, and serves as a rich reference point in developing a project or scheme.

architecture news