mexico city’s new international airport will not be realized following a public referendum, pushed for by mexico’s president-elect andrés manuel lópez obrador. although construction work on the $13 billion project — designed by foster + partners and FR-EE (fernando romero enterprise) had been underway since 2015, the president-elect had raised concerns about the airport’s maintenance costs, and argued that the project was tainted by corruption.

mexico city airport
all images courtesy of foster + partners | FR-EE

 

 

according to reuters, roughly a million people, just 1% of mexico’s electorate, participated in the referendum with almost 70% voting against the new airport. although the vote was non-binding, lopez obrador has pledged to respect the result.

 

a team comprising foster + partnersFR-EE (fernando romero enterprise), and NACO (netherlands airport consultants) first won an international competition to complete the airport in 2014. the plans involved the creation of one of the world’s largest airports with up to six runways and a 560,000-square-meter terminal.

mexico city airport
the airport would’ve been one of the world’s largest

 

 

although the project had been underway east of the city center, voters were asked if the next government should finish the project (which would replace the existing airport), or, alternatively expand a military air base around 50 km (30 miles) north of the capital and keep the current airport. at the time of writing there has been no official comment from either foster + partners or FR-EE.

mexico city airport
mexico’s president-elect had raised concerns about the airport’s maintenance costs

 

 

proposals by a variety of firms were unveiled in june 2014, including designs by JAHN, LOGUER, and ADG and sordo madaleno arquitectos, who teamed up with pascall+watson.


the airport had been under construction since 2015
image courtesy of nuevo aeropuerto MX

  • Waydago Mexico! That is an example of Democracy. Not the watered down “reprentative republic” we are. That’s great the people were able to stand up and say “No Mas!” There have been a gazillion corrupt public works schemes in Mexicos pathetic history. Now if the US could do such. For example, vote on whether it’s wall or infrastructure !

    mike grosser says:
  • Actually just and aprox of 0.5% to 0.55% percent of the population participate in the referendum. And with lots of evidence of manipulation and segregation of voters.

    Aldo Urban says:
  • Wow! What a waste of TIME and money. If the problem is corruption then remove the people and officials involved in it and replace them with those who are reliable and competent. NOT STOP THE PROJECT! Unfortunately, Mexico does not have Rodrigo Duterte who kicks-out government people who are and were found to be corrupt.

    Tung Cab says:
  • The problem was not the “idea of new airport” but it was filled with corruption, and unmanaged give away of government contracts. Not to mention a negative environmental impact. The referendum was a precedent between unrestricted authoritative neoliberalism . Keep in mind, this airport was under an administration that has 50% of his governors facing criminal charges. Politician charged on the billions (with a “B”) for corruption…

    Jorge Pascal says:
  • the thing is ( I’m living in CDMX ,16 years now) is that every government make their own dirty business and now its changing governments and the previous didn’t finish the process so the new one, wouldn’t earn from this.
    New president says ti be clean and anticorruption , but……now he’s going to build HIS new airport somewhere else. Conclusions on your own.

    mariano badaracco says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.

comments policy
LOG IN
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

PRODUCT LIBRARY

a diverse digital database that acts as a valuable guide in gaining insight and information about a product directly from the manufacturer, and serves as a rich reference point in developing a project or scheme.

architecture news