four top firms re envision penn station and madison square garden
 
four top firms re envision penn station and madison square garden
may 30, 2013

four top firms re envision penn station and madison square garden

four top firms re-envision penn station and madison square garden, new york, USA (above) a view of SOM’s circulation-focused green roof for the future stationimage © SOM

 

 

 

the municipal art society of new york, an important catalyst in the in the discourse about creating a more livable new york through intelligent urban planning and design, has challenged four top firms to re-envision penn station and madison square garden. diller, scofidio + renfro, SOM, SHoP architects and h3 hardy collaboration architecture all presented a range of possibilities for arguably the biggest transit hub in the western hemisphere, focusing on ways that design strategies and the built form could re-conceptualize transit access and posit solutions to the pedestrian congested nexus.

 

the challenge is timely– while penn station recieves well over half a million people each day, it is a particularly exigent time to think about unlocking the possibilities of the busy node. madison square garden’s special arena permit has expired, permitting the city to think about integrating the critical, yet cramped and dismal, station more readily into the urban fabric. since the original station was constructed in the 1960’s the amount of daily passengers has nearly tripled, and yet madison square garden, which sits atop the station, is on the verge of asking the city to renew its operating permit ‘in perpetuity’ thereby saddling future generations with and inadequate major transit hub that limits the growth of the area as a whole.

 

in addition to reframing penn station as a city-wide symbol of design, engineering and urban culture, the brief also called for a clear narrative for the greater midtown area that incorporates exciting possibilities for the 16 acre west side waterfront hudson yards site. the four firms, chosen for their vast experience with complex urban issues, presented their compelling solutions in timescenter yesterday followed by a roundtable discussion moderated by new york times architecture critic michael kimmelman.

 

the new york city council will vote on the fate of the madison square garden permit extension on june 19. of the critical event, the municipal art society president spoke frankly about the opportunity at stake:

 

a site which should be an economic development anchor for midtown and hudson yards is instead a serious challenge to the global competitiveness and economic health of new york city, a new penn station and a new arena will be an economic engine for new york city – creating thousands of jobs, unlocking billions of dollars in additional private investment, making millions of commutes a year faster and more comfortable, and re-affirming our sense that new york city can take on big projects and get them done.

 four top firms re envision penn station and madison square garden a sectional perspective view shows that central transparent ticket hub and expansive green space by SOMimage © SOM

 

 

 

SOM:

 

the mega firm proposed to move madison square garden to an adjacent site, while fantastically expanding penn station into an efficient, green vortex of circulation. sporting vegetated space four times the size of bryant park, more offices that rockefeller center and more cultural hotspots than lincoln center, the green-clad funnel of circulation is organized by a large, transparent ticketing hub and four mixed-use towers at the corners greatly expanding footprint of the station:

 

‘with all of these networks intersecting at penn station, its central hall would become the iconic gateway for nearly every visitor around the world.’

four top firms re envision penn station and madison square garden penn station is a democratized network of circulation in the proposal by h3image © h3 hardy collaboration architecture

 

 

 

h3 hardy collaboration architecture:

 

the firm was people-focused, seeking to move the complex to the west side waterfront and prioritizing a range of access, namely in form of a network of bike paths, a three acre public park and a two acre roof garden. rendering the rail a ‘mode of choice’ was a point of focus. madison square garden would be entirely moved off site.

 

’24 million square feet of private development around penn station and up seventh avenue serves as an economic engine for improvements and a revived world class commercial district.’ 

four top firms re envision penn station and madison square garden the ‘city within a city’ proposed by diller, scofidio + renfroimage © diller, scofidio + renfro

 

 

 

diller, scofidio + renfro:

 

the firm behind the high line, proposes to conceptually reframe the idea of waiting and increase the value of ‘downtime’ by making the station an attractive light-filled and layered space. ‘ penn 3.0’ seeks to be a destination, not merely  consolidated gateway, by providing 24 hour programming and hosting residents and transients alike:

 

‘not just a gateway to new york, the station will be a destination in itself with fast, transit oriented programs layered with slower destinations in a gradient of decelerating speed from tracks to roof.’

four top firms re envision penn station and madison square garden the SHoP proposal breaks up light in the centralized hall for the ‘gotham gateway’image © SHoP architects

 

 

 

SHoP architects:

 

the hall of penn station will be a bright, dematerialized, open plan space characterized by intuitiveness. to help defray public investment, the firm suggested a poignant level of civic and architectural synthesis by proposing to extend the highline so that the new station is connected to an offsite madison square garden. a front-facing gateway park would serve as a grand civil feature.

 

vishaan chakrabarti, a principal architect at SHoP, told the new york times on the aim of the design:

 

‘when’s the last time you heard someone say, ‘let’s meet for a drink at penn station? people say that about grand central all the time.’

  • Can someone please explain SOM’s section perspective. I guess I missed the part in structures class about floating architecture.

    SHop has designed the only space that I think would be comfortable and interesting. The other two projects are nonsense.

    jh says:
  • I agree. Shop has done a realistically sound proposal. The other two proposals are just pretty dumb renderings. These are the best architectural design firms in the world, we are talking about.

    Rahul Spall says:
  • @ jh,

    Didn’t you know Harry Potter is a senior partner at SOM?

    The joke aside, I think they just recycled, probably a reject design they did for a central station at some Chinese city, made a few mods (in photoshop) and presented the boards.

    idle_crane says:
  • None match the grandeur of the original Penn Station …I doubt anything ever will

    marisa muratori says:
  • Well, it should not match the Grandeur of the original Penn station. We live in different times now.

    Rahul Spall says:
  • Why today aren’t we allowed to re-imagine the grandeur of passed times? Why have we to deny all that was and replace it with some sterile modern stuff that in reality almost never works as it is planned? why can’t we take what has worked and change some things to make it better?

    are we not allowed today to rebuild lovely and splendid things that have been destroyed by the greedy generation before us? What is so bad about the past that makes so many people think they have to invent everything new? Architecture is for people and people have to live with it. Architects often just make art and don’t give a *** about how people are supposed to interact with the buildings. The only thing they care about is to make art and have a big name in the world. To be honest? I’d rather see some great things revived and rebuilt than new “grand designs” being put out there and nobody really cares about it two years later because it is either not useful or it goes to peaces because it is only built for the moment.

    Durability rather than fashionable architecture.

    SilScher says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.
all comments are reviewed for the purposes of moderation before publishing.

comments policy
LOG IN
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

PRODUCT LIBRARY

a diverse digital database that acts as a valuable guide in gaining insight and information about a product directly from the manufacturer, and serves as a rich reference point in developing a project or scheme.

architecture news

×
keep up with our daily and weekly stories
504,295 subscribers
- see sample
- see sample
designboom magazine