‘penleigh and essendon grammar school’ by mcbride charles ryan in victoria, australia all images courtesy mcbride charles ryan
australian architects mcbride charles ryan have just completed the ‘junior boys building at penleigh and essendon grammar school’, a two-storey educational facility in victoria, australia. located adjacent to a residential street, the design features a very discernible silhouette of a typical australian heritage home, referencing the local structural typology of the site.
(left) east facade (right) west facade
blocked out in black brickwork, the east facade is characterized by multiple peaks of varying heights. the overall form of the school is extruded from this outline and terminates at a low angle slope on the opposite side of the lot which opens up to an outdoor area for the students. the facade treatment of the main entrance employs a noticeably different effect of stripes and colours, a language that continues into the interior flooring.
main entrance and outdoor area
approach
street view
contrary to the blunt angles of the exterior, the ceiling is formed in a continuous, cloud-like surface. shaping the hallway as well as the classrooms, the resulting effect is a playful sculpting of the interior space.
hallway
(left) classroom (right) circulation
working room
classroom on ground level
exterior profile
site and floor plan / level 0
floor plan / level +1
cross section
south elevation
north elevation
MCBRIDE CHARLES RYAN (7)
Jun 25, 2012
Feb 21, 2011
Nov 08, 2010
Jun 16, 2010
Nov 05, 2009SCHOOL ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN (585)
Nov 24, 2021
Nov 21, 2021
Nov 17, 2021
Nov 08, 2021
Nov 03, 2021PRODUCT LIBRARY
Nov 25, 2021
Nov 24, 2021
Nov 22, 2021
Nov 22, 2021
You points are quite salient, I agree. On the other hand whose perception is more important in this case? Ours or the childrens? In a psychological sense young people do live in a “one-dimensional” world, it’s how their still undeveloped neurological systems process information. Now, I could see how the argument could be made that the structure should therefor serve to draw them to more complex and subtle elements, or at least get them to learn to recognize and come to have a constructive relationship to that which is not as literal, a vital quality that extends far beyond architecture. I don’t know. But it is an area which I feel is ripe for multi-disciplinary study; what would the ideal school look like? What is the ideal ratio of sophistication and conceptual accessibility (from their perspective)? Would adults also find it attractive? The castle at Disneyland comes to mind; hideous in many ways, surely, but also incredibly powerful in its ability to connect with young minds. This particular school appears to have perhaps strayed a bit to far into the literal and heavy-handed, but is that light-years more appropriate than the home-depot modernism of the average new American school (my country)?
And let me add one more thing. Too one dimensional, which is the opposite of what Good Architecture should be. We crave the Multi-dimensional and must live and breathe it ! If I didn’t know it I would guess one of the children designed it, or say by a group of children as a class project.
Not good! But not horrible either. Just seems to be rather minimal. A step backward perhaps.
Interesting, my first gut reaction to the structures silhouette was that it appears rather ominous and mildly threatening…but perhaps it creates an attractive edginess that is, dare I say, helpful, in creating an attractive atmosphere to modern children…it’s like going to school in a converted evil castle, adventurous, challenging, engaging, risky. This is good architecture.
Is the Penleigh and Essendon grammar school the last post-modern design or the the first neo-post-modern?
the section reminds me of the tention Utzon achieved with bagsvaerd church’s section, albeit motivated by different intentions I am guessing