OMA: plans for the commonwealth institute approved OMA: plans for the commonwealth institute approved
sep 19, 2009

OMA: plans for the commonwealth institute approved

revised plan for commonwealth institute by OMA

plans by the office for metropolitan architecture (OMA) for a new location for the design museum and new housing on the site of the former commonwealth institute on kensington high street were approved yesterday by the planning committee of the royal borough of kensington and chelsea.

the scheme was submitted to kensington and chelsea in april 2009 and revised in august 2009 after having been challenged by various conservation groups. the revisions include a rescaling of the three residential blocks and a change to the alterations for the interior of the existing exhibition building.   the commonwealth institute has stood empty and been closed to the public since 2002. in 2006, the grade II listed building (one of the highest protection ratings possible in the UK), was threatened with demolition after a (failed) government proposal to delist it.   OMA’s design seeks to save the building by re-injecting life into the modernist monument while retaining its distinctive copper roof and parabolic form. three new residential buildings will integrate into the fabric of the site, and aim to create a boost for the western end of kensington high street.   the move will give the design museum three times more space than its current home on the south bank. deyan sudjic, director of the design museum, said: ‘we are thrilled with the outcome, which now opens the way for the design museum to realise its vision of becoming a world-leading creative centre for design and architecture’.   aerial view of site

  • um…are they purposefully trying to hide the design…neither of these images tell me anything. Why is there a tree right in front of the perspective?

    hair piece says:
  • I thought the design museum was moving to behind the tate modern…anyone..?

    curious says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.

comments policy
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.


a diverse digital database that acts as a valuable guide in gaining insight and information about a product directly from the manufacturer, and serves as a rich reference point in developing a project or scheme.

architecture news