UPDATE: snøhetta's controversial 'a house to die in' project rejected by norway authorities

UPDATE: snøhetta's controversial 'a house to die in' project rejected by norway authorities

update 30/08/2018: oslo officials recently announced that they will support a proposal to reject melgaard and snnøhetta’s plans for the U.F.O-like home, prioritizing the locals’ requests and needs. according to the new york times, the oslo city council will hold a final vote next wednesday, however, already many municipal lawmakers from several parties stated that they will back the plan for the site to ‘remain a green area’.


(this article was originally published on august 2nd 2018). since 2011, norwegian artist bjarne melgaard and architecture practice snøhetta have exchange drawings, models and documents working towards the realization of the artist’s private residence where he will live and work. resulting from snøhetta’s interpretation of melgaard’s two-dimensional and analogue drawings, the renderings of the project—called until now ‘a house to die in’—showcase a U.F.O-shaped black crystalline structure suspended on columns that resemble animal-like creatures. and although the design process has been quite fluid, the journey towards realizing the project has been anything but predictable.

UPDATE: snøhetta's controversial 'a house to die in' project rejected by norway authoritiesthe building is clad with black, burned oak, inspired by japanese building traditions
all images courtesy of snøhetta and bjarne melgaard



located in the western part of oslo, on an area called ‘kikkut’, the site neighbors ‘ekely’, edvard munch’s (remember ‘the scream’?) winter atelier and residential villa demolished in 1960. and here is where the problem begins, where you understand that this unconventional building has challenged the traditional perception of the boundaries of art and architecture. after all, it is a statement on artistic freedom and architectural innovation that has questioned public administration and the voice of the people. why? because many disagree with it, starting with its location.

snohetta a house to die bjarne melgaard norway designboom



so, how far should norwegian authorities go to protect the legacy of munch? lead by an artist’s colony established in the 1950s, the opposition of the project states that the site is where munch lived and worked for 30 years and that they want to keep what’s left of him. norwegians also state that munch is part of their cultural history and identity and that everyone there is influenced by him—consciously or unconsciously—on different levels.

snohetta a house to die bjarne melgaard norway designboom



the final verdict will be given in the next coming weeks, and if approved, it will still need to go to the building authority and to the city council for final permission. ‘we have to recognize that it’s an emotional debate,’ said kjetil traedal thorsten, snøhetta’s founding partner to the new york times. ‘if there weren’t any emotional points of view connected to this, then it would have meant most of the norwegian population would have been ignorant of it.’

snohetta a house to die bjarne melgaard norway designboom
the snohetta a house to die in project started in 2011 and features animal-like columns 

snohetta a house to die bjarne melgaard norway designboom

snohetta a house to die bjarne melgaard norway designboom

    have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.
    all comments are reviewed for the purposes of moderation before publishing.

    comments policy
    LOG IN
    designboom's comment policy guidelines
    generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
    the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

    what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
    let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

    - please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
    - please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
    - please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
    - please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
    - please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
    (there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
    in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
    the best 100-200 entries too.)

    a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.


    a diverse digital database that acts as a valuable guide in gaining insight and information about a product directly from the manufacturer, and serves as a rich reference point in developing a project or scheme.

    architecture news

    keep up with our daily and weekly stories
    503,281 subscribers
    - see sample
    - see sample
    designboom magazine