vacant NL dutch pavilion at venice architecture biennale 2010 vacant NL dutch pavilion at venice architecture biennale 2010
aug 30, 2010

vacant NL dutch pavilion at venice architecture biennale 2010

view of the installation ‘vacant NL’ image © designboom

 

 

 

the installation ‘vacant NL’ calls upon the dutch government to make use of the enormous potential of inspiring, temporarily unoccupied buildings from the 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th and 21st centuries for innovation within the creative knowledge economy. is there so much unused architecture in the netherlands? few people think that a lot is left empty in the netherlands. on the contrary, many in the netherlands and abroad regard the country as densely populated and heavily occupied. some even regard the netherlands as full: there is hardly any room left for anything or anyone. it might therefore come as a surprise for them to know that a large part of the netherlands is indeed vacant and is growing more vacant by the day. millions of square meters to which no one pays any heed are at stake…. and they are often beautiful buildings.

view of the installation ‘vacant NL’ image © designboom

 

 

 

RAAAF (ronald rietveld and erik rietveld) has been invited by the netherlands architecture institute (NAI) to make a statement in the form of an installation about the potential of landscape architecture to contribute to resolving the major challenges facing society today.

 

the curators have put together a multidisciplinary team to design the installation, consisting of people with an interest in the innovative potential of vacant property and international experience in the creative industry:  jurgen bey (designer), joost grootens (graphic designer), ronald rietveld (landscape architect), erik rietveld  (philosopher/ economist), saskia van stein (curator NAI), and barbara visser (artist). landstra & de vries and claus wiersma (designer) are responsible for the construction of the exhibition.

close-up on the installation ‘vacant NL’ image © designboom

 

 

 

the availability of affordable, inspiring places of work is very important for young talent precisely now. as a result of the current economic crisis, many of our colleagues have lost their job, students of design and architecture graduate without any prospects of employment, many freelances have started to use up their savings, and the government is preparing unprecedented spending cuts.

 

how can we invest in innovation at a time of scarce resources? the large number of vacant public buildings means that the government is failing to make use of an enormous potential.

view of the installation ‘vacant NL’ image © designboom

 

 

 

these vacant buildings are costing society a lot of money at the moment, while they can also be used to accommodate the next generation of innovators. the large variety of empty heritage offers all kinds of possibilities for use. especially in combination with related more flexible regulations, interim use can challenge creative entrepreneurs who  are starting out to come up with innovative experiments. temporary locations are excellent laboratories for a government  that wants to try out non-regulated zones in which there is maximal scope for innovation. also for specific spatial conditions. partly due to a one-sided focus on traditional economic parameters, so far little attention has been paid to the spatial conditions for innovation.

view of the installation ‘vacant NL’ image © designboom

 

 

 

it sounds so obvious that it almost passes unnoticed, but the theme of this architecture biennale marks a turning point in its history. after more than thirty years of mainly asking the public to look at architecture, this time the focus is on something that the rest of the world has known about for a long time: that architecture is in the first place intended as a place to meet. this biennale tones down the importance of the architectural expression in order to give increased prominence to the architectural performance. the dutch contribution to this biennale brings this forgotten treasure back in circulation.

view of the installation ‘vacant NL’, ground level to upper level image © designboom

view of the installation ‘vacant NL’ image © designboom

building up of the installation ‘vacant NL’ image © designboom

 

 

 

a landscape of vacant properties, spaces that are not monotonous, but are very diverse because the buildings were once designed for a specific purpose : lighthouses, hospitals, water towers, factory buildings, airports, hangars, offices, forts, bunkers, schools, swimming pools and many more.

view from the entrance on ground level, the foam models are placed on iron wires image © designboom

 

 

 

temporary use as strategy thousands of vacant buildings that are not privately owned but are state property. in the principle they belong to all people in the netherlands. the ‘dutch atlas of vacancies’ examines buildings, properties that become vacant for a period between one week and ten years.

dutch atlas of vacancy image © designboom

view of the installation ‘vacant NL’ image © designboom

image © designboom

image © designboom

the making of foam models image © designboom

some of the models were finished on site image © designboom

vacant NL, drawing produced by rietveld landscape

detail

the rietveld pavilion is the ideal location for the dutch submission. the building itself has stood vacant for more than 39 years. built in 1954, it stands on dutch territory and is vacant for around 8.5 months a year.

view of the installation ‘vacant NL’ image © designboom

 

 

 

the curators focused on the specific conditions for what the government calls the ‘key sector creative industry’: architecture, design, digital media, games, fashion, graphic design, etc. because the creative sector can make a relevant contribution to the complex challenges facing society. the cooperation between creative industry and scientists is crucial in this respect. this is visualized by a web-diagram-wall-display.

image © designboom

image © designboom

if the right people are in the right place, even a project that lasts only a week can make a difference.

visualization of fundamental values and people who can transmit them image © designboom

image © designboom

curators rietveld landscape (ronald and erik rietveld), saskia van stein (curator at NAI) and designer juergen bey (left to right) image © designboom

vacant NL banner at the entrance of the dutch pavilion in the giardini (venice gardens) image © designboom

see 180 degrees video of the exhibition

 

credits:

 

commissioner: ole bouman (NAI) supervision: ole bouman (NAI), linda vlassenrood (NAI) curator: rietveld landscape (ronald rietveld & erik rietveld) project leader: saskia van stein (NAI) project team: jurgen bey, joost grootens, ronald rietveld, erik rietveld, saskia van stein, barbara visser production: marcel kollen (NAI) graphic design: studio joost grootens / joost grootens with christiaan drost, margriet hogenbirk, arthur roeloffzen, tine van wel collaborators: RAAAF: chantal bax, kasper jacobs, peer frantzen, arna mackic international coordination: fanny smelik (NAI) communications: rinske brand, brand! communicatie technical realisation (exhibition): landstra & de vries i.c.w. claus wiersma hans jansen, mark jooren, jochem klarenbeek, frits ham, carlo van driel, jeannine van erk

NAi _ architecture of consequence the netherlands architecture institute (NAi) is the platform for architecture, where challenges and designs can meet in the most inspiring way. central to the NAI’s agenda for the future is architecture of consequence which shows that architecture can play a part in formulating solutions to widespread global problems, and help to build a more sustainable future. the NAI calls on designers, principals and policymakers to seize this opportunity and become a force for positive change.

  • That’s a very beautiful exhibition.

    roche says:
  • el chavo del 8 !!!!

    chilindrina says:
  • Very inspiring!..and little sad

    mantis says:
  • Wow!

    Pippo says:
  • this is very nice but I am afraid it would have been more relevant five or ten years ago…Good work anyway

    YukiNa says:
  • sorry guys but these are so boring, this wouldn’t look fresh even in the 80’s.

    joe berlin says:
  • look “fresh2?
    what do you mean?
    IT MAKES SENSE AND CALLS FOR PARTICIPATION

    piet says:
  • This was the best pavilion show.Great pictures designboom !

    Helene says:
  • very original presentation. brava

    natalia says:
  • These comments by people who say that things are not “fresh” or “relevant” piss me off.

    Are the buildings no longer vacant? Is the Dutch populous “pre-informed”? Has the matter been addressed? No.

    What these folks are really saying is, “I’m a fashionable guy who knows the lead edge of what’s fashionable and I’ve already seen something in this style so I’m bored with your “tired” efforts. Been there done that.”

    Is the world better or are you no longer amused? This work isn’t confectionary it is urban. It is done to do more than amuse you.

    I think its useful and amusing. You are not.

    Brian says:
  • very clean!

    leyla says:
  • I returned several times to the Dutch pavilion because the interplay between the beautiful light of this building by Gerrit Rietveld and the blue foam was spectacular.

    john says:
  • great piece, all the more since some untold thousands of dutch squatters are facing serious difficulties now that the Bill to criminalize squatting will go into effect on oct. 1st.

    ae says:
  • the presentation is true-lly unique ……….

    veena narayan says:
  • Very smart and economical way of showing the work. Great work !

    Poke says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.

comments policy
LOG IN
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

architecture news