is an international airport worth destroying machu picchu's fragile inca citadel ruins?

is an international airport worth destroying machu picchu's fragile inca citadel ruins?

peruvian archaeologists have condemned the development of a new airport which will fly tourists direct to machu picchu in peru. declared a UNESCO world heritage site almost forty years ago, critics fear low-flying planes would cause structural damages to inca ruins in the area, meanwhile construction could put a strain on already limited water supplies.


plans for the airport were first announced in 2012 by peru’s former president ollanta humala. seven years on construction has began in chinchero, a picturesque inca town about 3,800 meters above sea level that is the gateway to the sacred valley. now, as bulldozers in the area clear millions of tonnes of earth to make way for the new airport, the fragile inca citadel is increasingly under threat.

is an international airport worth destroying machu picchu's fragile inca citadel ruins? designboom
cover image © martin st-amant
all other images via lonely planet



chinchero was built six centuries ago as a royal estate for the inca ruler túpac inca yupanqui. a hotspot for tourists, experts say the site is already being slowly damaged by the hordes of tourists that visit it every year. in 2017, there were more than 1.5 million visitors to the area, almost double the limit recommended by UNESCO.


it seems the government’s priority does not align with that of the united nations who declared machu picchu a UNESCO world heritage site in 1983. while the specialized agency has asked peru to limit visitors to the famous site, the government’s plan will make it easier for people to access.


the current nearest airport, which is located in cusco 75km (47 miles) away, is only accessible via train tracks and long winding paths travelled by foot. it ‘is limited to taking narrow-bodied aircraft on stopover flights from peru’s capital, lima, and nearby cities such as la paz, bolivia,’ according to the guardian.

is an international airport worth destroying machu picchu's fragile inca citadel ruins? designboom



a petition is circulating the internet asking the president and peruvian government to reconsider or relocate the airport from chinchero. it might seem like a long shot considering the plans were announced in 2012 but environmental groups were successful in pressuring the peruvian government to reverse a decision allowing flights over the inca ruins in 2006.


in 2017, unesco threatened to put the citadel on its list of world heritage sites in danger. in response the peruvian government has tightened entry requirements, introducing strict time slots for visitors and one-way circuits around the ruins.

  • Mass tourism is always predatory.
    Certain tourist spots in the world must have even roadblocks to prevent the hordes of tourists from harassing this sites simply for what is fashionable at the moment.
    In Brazil, there are places of exuberant nature, whose original striking experiences are being annihilated by the ecologically unprepared crowds that flock to these places … A devastation promoted by the financial interests of certain unscrupulous travel promoters and by the crowd impelled by the futility and ignorance of both.

    Sérgio Werneck de Figueiredo says:
  • First of all, I think it’s very bad that some journalists put up sensationalist titles just to get more readers.
    The new airport construction project is almost 90 km from the town of Aguas Calientes. And from Aguas Calientes to the archeological center of Machu Picchu is a distance of almost 10 km.
    Therefore, I do not understand how an airport 1 located 100 km away from an archaeological site can destroy it. It is totally false to indicate that the planes will arrive directly to Machu Picchu. Please do not be carried away by false news as many people depend on tourism in our country. If there were any aggression against Machu Picchu, we ourselves, the actors of tourism would condemn it.

    katherine says:
  • Noooo

    Mariana O'Brien says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.
all comments are reviewed for the purposes of moderation before publishing.

comments policy
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.


a diverse digital database that acts as a valuable guide in gaining insight and information about a product directly from the manufacturer, and serves as a rich reference point in developing a project or scheme.

design news

keep up with our daily and weekly stories
493,007 subscribers
- see sample
- see sample