r4 by mark cunningham   renault 4 ever shortlisted entry r4 by mark cunningham   renault 4 ever shortlisted entry
jul 13, 2011

r4 by mark cunningham renault 4 ever shortlisted entry

the renault ‘r4volution concept by mark cunningham’

 

 

the ‘r4’ (‘r4volution’) concept by UK-based designer mark cunningham is an all-purpose compact family adaptation of the renault ‘4L’. in addition to utilizing sustainable manufacturing practices, the concept involves a system whereby the vehicle body and the engine are owned separately, easing replacement and upgrading over time without the need to purchase a new car. the ‘r4’ design is one of fifty projects shortlisted from over 3200 designs from 92 countries in designboom’s recent RENAULT 4 EVER competition, which asked participants to redesign the renault 4 with an eye towards historical lineage, contemporary aesthetics, and sustainability.

cunningham’s 5-door ‘r4’ satisfies a range of everyday family needs, featuring a built-in bicycle carrier and oversized tailgate. manufacturing practices are centered around reuse and recyclability, utilizing recycled plastics for the body panels and reconceptualizing the dark grey appearance caused by the reuse of lower grade plastics into ‘a re-cycled badge of honour‘ that is a characteristic trim on the series.

small ‘rain gutters‘ at the base of the windshield collect and filter rain water to top off the fluid reservoir, whose consistency is regulated by the placement of a dishwasher-style tablet in the reservoir. the new ‘r4’ does not feature a stereo but rather a line-in connector, presuming that most purchasers of the vehicle already own and prefer to use an mp3 player. the variation prevents a substantial cost and use of resources.

 

 

rear 3/4 view

 

 

rear view

 

 

car ownership follows the logic of the circular economy in a system where the vehicle and the engine unit are owned separately. the engine and gearbox are ‘umbilically linked’ to the car’s drive, permitting the engine to be upgraded over the course of the car’s life. cunningham envisions the car as being available as a full electric model or with an efficient gasoline-based unit. the modular engine system also means that users can purchase the car with the less expensive gasoline (petrol) engine, and switch to an electric configuration later on, dividing the cost. traded-in engines would be used by renault for a discounted line of certified preowned units.

 

 

profile view and exterior concept diagrams

 

 

interior design views

 

 

the vehicle makes use of recyclable materials and efficient resource management, in addition to a circular economy lifecycle concept

— this article is one in a series of features on the shortlisted entries of the RENAULT 4 EVER competition. renault is proud of the work submitted to the competition and extends sincere thanks to all of its participants. the jury has still not made its final decision on the winning entry, but the results will be published to designboom at the end of july.

  • nice work!

    braun says:
  • thats nice, this one deserves to be shortlisted.

    samyar says:
  • great stuff, well thought-out and well executed design.

    nick says:
  • a modern R4 with thought put into the circular economy. I agree, this one deserves to be shortlisted!

    Resi says:
  • definitely has possibilities. i understand the update but does the world have too many of this class of car already? I think so.

    charles says:
  • you win! PERFECT!

    ison says:
  • Honors the tradition but moves on perfectly. Goes beyond the appearance to solve bigger problems. Love the thoughtfulness of this design. Just build them … start now.

    Geoff Bush says:
  • By far the best one so far!

    Jimbo_Jet says:
  • This is the level of development that I believe those who have been disappointed so far, like me, would come to expect from shortlisted entries. Not only the thought process is clear but it is also illustrated, so it is not just verbiage and a 3D model. However, I wish the attention to aesthetics would have been the same as in the narrative. The wheels are too big for the wheel well, for a car with that much ground clearance there is no room to hit a bump on the road. Despite its defects is a pretty strong concept

    Dave says:
  • Striking design, gorgeous look, easy to accept by target public.
    Today is imprescindível this “LEGO” philosofy, to make simple, inteligent and efficient parts, with easy maintenance, versatility and interchangeability in options choice.
    Good principles and refined taste.
    Congratulations to Mr. Mark Cunningham.

    Sergius says:
  • was the challenge theme to design the next tank for the war to mars??
    can you speak about efficiency with that tires??
    terrible project.

    davide T. says:
  • Have all the people that were shortlisted been notified?
    Or are they finding out like the rest of us?

    question__man says:
  • I hope Designboom does NOT delete this comment! I feel that so far the entries shortlisted have been picked mostly based on their 3D modelling rather than on the overall attention to automotive details. For an international competition with over 3000 participants I have a hard time believing these are the very best projects of the bunch. The Colombo design competition is a good example, where entrants considered basic restrictions of producing a handle such as the internal mechanisms. Automotive design is no different, one must consider the structural integrity, componentry and safety implications of a design even if it is a concept as these will continue to be part of the criteria for the industry. This entry showcases more thought than the previous 2 ones but I feel that its concentration was more on modelling. I would like to know how having a modular unit for the engine & transmission would affect the aesthetics, besides, if you look at the size of electric car batteries these are far bigger than a gas tank, how such transition affect the packaging of the car?

    ArtCrit says:
  • What’s with these haters crying about each shortlisted entry! There can be 47 designs better than the three already published. Complaining seems sad because either you entered your design and it’s not shortlisted or you never entered and think you could have done better and that is even more pathetic. STFU!

    Robert says:
  • Why are trolls so facinated with tires?

    Robert says:
  • Robert, the idea with some of this comments is not to insult anyone but as I said before out 3000 entries you would think that the best 50 would have considered something so fundamental as wheel size. If you take a few minutes to research it, tire size affects fuel efficiency and determines the weight and size of other components such as the suspension. Even if only 3 have been revealed the level of design is low. Look comparisons are unavoidable and when you look at what Renault did with the frendzy there’s a lot to be desired out of these entries. To expect better resolved designs out of finalists in an international competition is not pathetic, I bet any of these would be shred to pieces if any designer presents them at a review in any automotive studio in the world

    Kim says:
  • I was optimistic when I saw the front. But the side rendering falls very short for me. All of the personality of the R4 greenhouse is lost.

    Marc D. says:
  • the front is so cool!

    tounsi says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.

comments policy
LOG IN
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

PRODUCT LIBRARY

a diverse digital database that acts as a valuable guide in gaining insight and information about a product directly from the manufacturer, and serves as a rich reference point in developing a project or scheme.

design news