MIT researchers find new approach suggesting path to emissions-free cement
 

MIT researchers find new approach suggesting path to emissions-free cement

cement is the world’s leading construction material — but did you know producing it is one of the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions accounting for about 8 percent of all such releases? this means that if cement production were a country, it would be the world’s third-largest emitter. aiming to solve this problem, a team of researches at MIT has come up with a new way of manufacturing emission-free cement that could eliminate the total emissions while also making other useful products in the process.

MIT researchers find new approach suggesting path to emissions-free cement
in a demonstration of the basic chemical reactions used in the new process, electrolysis takes place in neutral water. dyes show how acid (pink) and base (purple) are produced at the positive and negative electrodes. a variation of this process can be used to convert calcium carbonate (CaCO3) into calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), which can then be used to make portland cement without producing any greenhouse gas emissions. cement production currently causes 8 percent of global carbon emissions.
image by felice frankel

 

 

‘about 1 kilogram of carbon dioxide is released for every kilogram of cement made today,’ comments yet-ming chiang the kyocera professor of materials science and engineering at MIT. ‘that adds up to 3 to 4 gigatons (billions of tons) of cement, and of carbon dioxide emissions, produced annually today, and that amount is projected to grow. the number of buildings worldwide is expected to double by 2060, which is equivalent to “building one new new york city every 30 days,’ he says. and the commodity is now very cheap to produce: it costs only about 13 cents per kilogram, which he says makes it cheaper than bottled water.

 

time-lapse video of the decarbonation cell containing pH indicator dye. this decarbonation cell starts at pH 6, as indicated by the yellow color, and has no separators. calcium carbonate powder has been placed at the bottom of the left chamber.

 

 

cement is made by grinding limestone and then cooking it with sand and clay at high heat, which is produced by burning coal. this process generates carbon dioxide from the burning of the coal and from the gases released from the limestone. the new process created by chiang would eliminate or drastically reduce the emissions by first, eliminating fossil fuels from the heating process by exchanging them with clean, renewable energy. then, it would use an electrolyzer to dissolve the limestone.

 

time-lapse video of the decarbonation cell containing pH indicator dye. porous paper separators have been placed in front of each electrode. B, and CaCO3 powder in a cup surrounding the OER electrode on the left.

 

 

‘in their laboratory demonstration, the team carried out the key electrochemical steps required, producing lime from the calcium carbonate, but on a small scale,’ reports MIT news. ‘the process looks a bit like shaking a snow-globe, as it produces a flurry of suspended white particles inside the glass container as the lime precipitates out of the solution.’

 

 

project info:

 

name: emissions-free cement

developed by: researchers at MIT

  • Emission free cement…!!!

    That is clearly hype and advertising…not honest science!!!

    First, I would really love to know the primary funding source for this research and information. It wouldn’t be the “cement industry” itself would it?

    Second, starting an article with cherry picked and groomed statistics is always a red flag from my perspective. OPC (ordinary portland cement) is the world’s construction industry addiction…not a great building material. Yet down playing its emissions to only 8% is clearly a groomed statistic and not taking into account all the other support industries that are involved in its harvesting, transportation, fabrication, and manufacture …as well as…its continued replacement as the OPC infrastructure of the world falls apart around us about every 20 to 40 years only to be replaced with the same crap product…MODERN OPC.. Which is great for the cement and construction industry behind it for sure…So to be honest, let’s use the real stats on what it does to the level of pollution generated across the board from the complete picture of its use (and re-use) at 25%…not 8%.

    As to a “new way,” I find these comments amusing when I read them. Most often it is more about “reinventing the wheel” than a “new way.” A wheel, by the way, that wasn’t broken in the first place and functioned perfectly (and better than today) for the first four thousand years of its existence. Humans had geopolymeric methods we are still trying to “re-learn” and related pozzolans (aka natural cements) far superior to modern day OPC, but the greedy could not really build a “super industry” around those modalities so it got “dumbed down” and industrialies to be a major consumable and also profitable…NOT…a better building material. So this may be a “new way” (perhaps?) at making a crappy building material easier to make, but why do it when the original materials have proven over millennia to be better and there are alternatives to it anyway?

    TosaTomoDesign says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.
all comments are reviewed for the purposes of moderation before publishing.

comments policy
LOG IN
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

PRODUCT LIBRARY

a diverse digital database that acts as a valuable guide in gaining insight and information about a product directly from the manufacturer, and serves as a rich reference point in developing a project or scheme.

technology news

×
keep up with our daily and weekly stories
501,538 subscribers
- see sample
- see sample