at 18:27 EDT yesterday, spaceX made history by pulling off a successful relaunch of one of their falcon 9 rockets into space, marking the first ever time that an orbital rocket has been launched for a second flight. the company—founded by tesla CEO elon musk—has been working to design reusable rockets since back in 2011, under the ethos of making space travel cheaper and more accessible. until yesterday, almost all previously used rockets had been designed for single use, meaning that after their big launch into space, they can basically be discarded. by designing a rocket with reusability in mind, elon musk declares that spaceX have achieved what is going to be ’ultimately, a huge revolution in spaceflight.’

spaceX-falcon9-reusable-rocket-designboom-818-019
spaceX’s falcon 9 is the world’s first fully-reusable rocket

 

when a falcon 9 rocket launches into space, each consists of two parts—the booster, and the second stage, whether that be a cargo to send supplies into space, or a satellite. following take-off, the booster separates from the second stage and decends back to earth. whilst most boosters are designed to burn up on re-entry into the atmosphere, the falcon9 is designed not only to withstand reentry, but also to return neatly to the launch pad for a verticle landing. by designing the VTOL (vertical take-off vertical landing) system, spaceX successfully managed to save their rockets completely intact, for relaunch into space. having staged over 30 successful falcon 9 rocket launches, with eight successful landings, spaceX had built up quite a stockpile of the spacecrafts.

spaceX-falcon9-reusable-rocket-designboom-818-005
a falcon 9 booster lands neatly back down on spaceX’s drone ship

 

 

the company have made conversation with their efforts to cleanly land their rockets back on earth, in an incentive to reuse them in the future. considering that a new falcon 9 rocket costs around 54 million dollars to produce—the same as a commercial airplane which condusts tens of thousands of flights over its lifetime—even the re-use of a single booster indicates the cost effectiveness of spaceX’s philosophy. as the company declare, ‘a rapidly reusable space launch vehicle will reduce the cost of reaching earth orbit by a hundredfold.’

spaceX-falcon9-reusable-rocket-designboom-818-016
space X have built up quite the stock of falcon 9 rockets

 

 

the rocket sucessfully recycled by spaceX is the second falcon 9 that the company ever recovered—since they wanted to save the first rocket that they ever landed for display at their california HQ. prior to the re-launch, CEO elon musk had said that ‘if one can figure out how to effectively reuse rockets just like airplanes, the cost of access to space will be reduced by as much as a factor of a hundred.  a fully reusable vehicle has never been done before. that really is the fundamental breakthrough needed to revolutionize access to space.’

spaceX-falcon9-reusable-rocket-designboom-818-021
the used falcon 9 rockets are stored in hangar 39A

 

 

before re-launch, the booster needed to be inspected, refurbished and tested, meaning that the turnover time between landing and relaunching a rocket stands currently at around four months. in the future, the company’s goal is to land and re-launch a rocket on the very same day. following the successful relaunch, spaceX plans to launch around six pre-flown falcon 9s in 2017 alone.

spaceX-falcon9-reusable-rocket-designboom-818-020
the used falcon 9 shows wear on the exterior, but is perfectly functional to voyage again

spaceX-falcon9-reusable-rocket-designboom-818-013
the spaceX falcon 9 is designed to withstand re-entry into the atmosphere

spaceX-falcon9-reusable-rocket-designboom-818-011
spaceX plan to eventually land and re-launch a falcon 9 rocket in the same day

spaceX-falcon9-reusable-rocket-designboom-818-014
each falcon 9 costs around 54 million dollars to produce

  • SpaceX makes NASA look like a welfare program, with extended benefits, for not so competent engineers.

    Jim

    JimCan says:
  • No it doesn’t, Jim. SpaceX does amazing things, with much owed to NASA, JPL, NIST and numerous other organizations for their pioneering research and exploration. To call NASA’s engineers incompetent (many of whom are contracted from private business), tells me: A. You’re not an engineer. B. You’re projecting. C. You’re commenting with a political slant, and have no experience or expertise in the aerospace industry.

    JLWright says:

have something to add? share your thoughts in our comments section below.

comments policy
LOG IN
designboom's comment policy guidelines
generally speaking, if we publish something, it's because we're genuinely interested in the subject. we hope you'll share this interest and if you know even more about it, please share! our goal in the discussion threads is to have good conversation and we prefer constructive opinions. we and our readers have fun with entertaining ones. designboom welcomes alerts about typos, incorrect names, and the like.
the correction is at the discretion of the post editor and may not happen immediately.

what if you disagree with what we or another commenter has to say?
let's hear it! but please understand that offensive, inappropriate, or just plain annoying comments may be deleted or shortened.

- please do not make racist, sexist, anti-semitic, homophobic or otherwise offensive comments.
- please don't personally insult the writers or your fellow commenters.
- please avoid using offensive words, replacing a few letters with asterisks is not a valid workaround.
- please don't include your website or e-mail address in your comments for the purpose of self-promotion.
- please respect jury verdicts and do not discuss offensively on the competition results
(there is only one fist prize, and designboom usually asks renown professionals to help us to promote talent.
in addition to the awarded designs, we do feel that almost all deserve our attention, that is why we publish
the best 100-200 entries too.)

a link is allowed in comments as long as they add value in the form of information, images, humor, etc. (links to the front page of your personal blog or website are not okay). unwelcome links (to commercial products or services of others, offensive material etc. ) will be redacted. and, ... yes, spam gets banned. no, we do not post fake comments.

technology news